Current:Home > StocksThe White House is cracking down on overdraft fees -MarketStream
The White House is cracking down on overdraft fees
ViewDate:2025-04-28 08:36:44
NEW YORK (AP) — The Biden administration has finalized a rule limiting overdraft fees banks can charge, as part of the White House’s campaign to reduce junk fees that hit consumers on everyday purchases, including banking services. President Joe Biden had called the fees, which can be as high as $35, “exploitative,” while the banking industry has lobbied extensively to keep the existing fee structures in place.
Under the finalized rule, banks will be able to choose from three options: they may charge a flat overdraft fee of $5, they may charge a fee that covers their costs and losses, or they may charge any fee so long as they disclose the terms of the overdraft loan the way they would for any other loan, typically expressed as an annual percentage rate, or APR.
While banks have cut back on overdraft fees in the past decade, the nation’s biggest banks still take in roughly $8 billion in the charges every year, according to data from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and bank public records. Currently, there is no cap on the overdraft fees that banks can legally charge.
Right now, when a bank temporarily lends a consumer money when their account has reached a zero balance, the consumer is typically responsible for paying back both the overdrawn amount and an additional fee, which can be more than the original amount charged. In one example often cited by opponents of the fees, a $3 cup of coffee can end up costing someone more than $30.
The finalized rule is set to take effect in October 2025, but the incoming Trump administration has yet to tap anyone to lead the CFPB, and has mentioned the idea of eliminating the agency.
The finalized rule applies to banks and credit unions that have more than $10 billion in assets, which includes the nation’s largest banks. Banks have previously sued the CFPB over these rules and caps on credit card late fees, and are likely to sue again. Congress also has the ability to challenge or overturn the rule.
Overdraft fees originated during a time when consumers wrote and cashed checks more frequently — so that the checks would clear instead of bouncing, if there was an issue of timing — but banks steadily increased the fees in the first two decades of the 2000s. The fees disproportionately affect banks’ most cash-strapped consumers. A majority of overdrafts (70%) are charged to customers with average account balances between $237 and $439, according to the CFPB.
The agency estimates the new rule would save consumers about $5 billion in annual overdraft fees, or $225 per household that typically experiences the fees.
_____
The Associated Press receives support from Charles Schwab Foundation for educational and explanatory reporting to improve financial literacy. The independent foundation is separate from Charles Schwab and Co. Inc. The AP is solely responsible for its journalism.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (31554)
Related
- 'Vanderpump Rules' star DJ James Kennedy arrested on domestic violence charges
- Former cadets accuse the Coast Guard Academy of failing to stop sexual violence
- Will Taylor Swift show up for Chiefs’ season opener against the Ravens on Thursday night?
- Pennsylvania voters can cast a provisional ballot if their mail ballot is rejected, court says
- Whoopi Goldberg is delightfully vile as Miss Hannigan in ‘Annie’ stage return
- Giants reward Matt Chapman's bounce-back season with massive extension
- 'Love is Blind' Season 7 reveals new location, release date: What to know
- FBI received tips about online threats involving suspected Georgia shooter | The Excerpt
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- TikToker Taylor Frankie Paul Shares One Regret After Mormon Swinging Sex Scandal
Ranking
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Ben Affleck's Past Quotes on Failed Relationships Resurface Amid Jennifer Lopez Divorce
- Freshman classes provide glimpse of affirmative action ruling’s impact on colleges
- Husband of missing Virginia woman to head to trial in early 2025
- Have Dry, Sensitive Skin? You Need To Add These Gentle Skincare Products to Your Routine
- Physician sentenced to 9 months in prison for punching police officer during Capitol riot
- US widens indictment of Russians in ‘WhisperGate’ conspiracy to destroy Ukrainian and NATO systems
- Video game performers reach agreement with 80 video games on AI terms
Recommendation
Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
Would Dolly Parton Ever Host a Cooking Show? She Says...
Texas would need about $81.5 billion a year to end property taxes, officials say
US widens indictment of Russians in ‘WhisperGate’ conspiracy to destroy Ukrainian and NATO systems
FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
'Great' dad. 'Caring' brother. Families mourn Georgia high school shooting victims.
Sicily Yacht Sinking: Why Mike Lynch’s Widow May Be Liable for $4 Billion Lawsuit
Ruth Harkin memoir shows wit and fortitude of a woman who's made a difference